Streamlining Regression Cycles through API Test Automation

The client’s order management platform powered order processing, inventory management, and shipping workflows for a global e-commerce platform. Frequent deployments and microservice-based architecture made end-to-end regression testing slow, error-prone, and heavily dependent on UI automation.

Unlock Your Growth Potential with a Free Maturity Assessment.

Subscribe for updates from Qeagle.

The Pulse of the Industry
— Direct to You.

PROJECT HIGHLIGHTS

Challenges Faced

Slow Regression Cycles: UI-based testing took 6+ hours, delaying releases.

Microservice Dependencies: Testing individual services without relying on the UI was not feasible in the existing setup.

Limited Test Coverage: Critical API workflows lacked automated validation.

Manual Test Data Setup: Test data creation and environment setup required manual steps.

Goals of the Automation Initiative

✔ Build a scalable API automation framework covering critical business flows.
✔ Shift regression testing from the UI layer to the API layer for faster execution.
✔ Integrate API tests into the CI/CD pipeline for continuous feedback.
✔ Automate data creation and teardown to enable independent test execution.

Solution Approach

1 : API Automation Framework Design
  • Chose Rest Assured (Java) as the core API automation tool.

  • Built a modular test framework using TestNG with Allure reporting.

  • Designed reusable request/response classes for RESTful APIs.

2 : Data Management Automation
  • Automated test data creation via internal APIs and database scripts.

  • Used JSON data-driven testing to validate multiple scenarios.

3 : CI/CD Integration
  • Integrated tests into Jenkins pipelines for scheduled regression and PR triggers.

  • Configured Slack and email notifications for test run summaries.

4 : Test Optimization
  • Grouped tests into Smoke, Sanity, and Full Regression suites.

  • Implemented parallel execution using TestNG and thread-safe practices.

Results Achieved

Key MetricBefore AutomationAfter Automation
Regression Cycle Time6+ hours1.5 hours
API Test Coverage<20%85%+
Defect Leakage to ProductionHighReduced by 60%
Test Execution FrequencyWeeklyDaily on PR merges
Manual Test EffortHighMinimal

Key Benefits Realized

🔹 Reduced regression cycle time by 75%, accelerating release velocity.
🔹 Improved coverage of business-critical APIs including Order Placement, Inventory Sync, and Shipment Creation.
🔹 Enabled teams to isolate and fix API defects before UI testing, reducing overall defect resolution time.
🔹 Automated test environments and data management, eliminating manual dependencies.

Related Case Studies

Enhancing QA in Investments

Enhancing QA in Investments

Discover how Quality Assurance is transforming the…

Staff Servicing – Enhancing QA in Client-Facing Operations and Service Workflows

Staff Servicing – Enhancing QA in Client-Facing…

Explore how Quality Assurance improvements in staff…

BCB Lending Automation – Leading Bank

BCB Lending Automation – Leading Bank

Discover how BCB Lending processes at Leading…

CRM Sales – Microsoft Dynamics 365 QA for Functional and Automation Enhancements

CRM Sales – Microsoft Dynamics 365 QA…

Explore how Quality Assurance was strengthened for…

Insurance API Migration – Java to C# Modernization with Scalable Automation

Insurance API Migration – Java to C#…

Discover how migrating insurance APIs from Java…

Test Automation and QA Process Transformation

Test Automation and QA Process Transformation

Explore how modernizing QA through intelligent test…

Let’s Discuss Quality Engineering That Delivers Results.

“We respect your privacy and will never share your information."